Google Turns on Desktop Docs Editor for iPad


By Darrell Etherington Dec. 10, 2010, 9:00am PDT on Gigaom

Google made it possible to edit and create Google Docs documents with your iPad on Nov. 17, but the editor it introduced was optimized for mobile and lacked many features of the desktop version. Late Dec. 9, the company introduced a link that lets you switch to the full version of the editor to access those features.

I readily admit that I haven’t put in much time with Google’s web-based iPad Docs editor, but part of the reason for that was that I just couldn’t do many of the things that I do using Google Docs-linked iPad text editing apps like PlainText and Writer. An all-Google solution is appealing in that I don’t have to update my documents after the fact  if I want the most current version to be available from wherever I happen to be, but even with a more robust feature set, can Google Docs on the web work as your only iPad document-editing solution?

The desktop version brings font and alignment changing, bulleted and numbered lists and adding links, among other things. If you’ve ever used Google Docs on a computer, you’ll be familiar with everything, as it’s the exact same web app. The full Google spreadsheet editor is also now available in addition to the mobile client, which allows you to insert formulas from the formula bar.

Whereas Google’s mobile Docs editors are little more than glorified note-takers, the desktop editor at least offers you useful tools that go beyond simple data entry. But it does so in a layout that isn’t optimized for the iPad in the way that native apps or even iPad-specific web apps are. In portrait mode, things look too small to be very usable, and every time I actually start editing, the first line of my document gets pushed up under the margin ruler at the top of the input field. Arrow keys on the Bluetooth keyboard (something I think is a must for knocking out any serious writing on the iPad) don’t work for navigating within the document, either.

I’m glad Google’s turned on editing for Docs on the iPad, because I wanted it desperately when I first got the Apple tablet. But native apps have come out that allow me to interact with my Google Docs, and I haven’t looked back. Now I can make small changes right in Docs itself, but ultimately, this is yet another release from Google that I can live quite comfortably without.

Apple’s Greatest Advantage: The Apple Ecosystem


By Jon Buys Dec. 10, 2010, 1:00pm PDT on Gigaom

Google’s power in the mobile computing world seems to grow with every new product announcement and Android device that comes to market. But for all its reach, the search giant is missing one piece of the puzzle that Apple does better than anyone else: product integration.

It starts with one device. Maybe it’s an iPod; maybe it’s a first Mac; but from that first product, you discover Apple’s unique take on technology. Apple treats each device it manufactures with care, sweating the little details like font choices and icon design, and thinking about how it all fits together. Each device Apple creates plays a part in the overall ecosystem, and the links between them are clear.

I recently stepped outside the cozy Apple ecosystem and purchased an Android phone, the HTC Desire. It was on sale at a steep discount, and I thought I would be able to integrate it into my work/life flow. I was wrong, and the phone is being returned.

The phone was powerful, and had some very interesting features, but it was so entirely different from the rest of my Mac setup that nothing felt right. I could go into detail about application crashes, frustrating hardware, the sordid Android Market (I wouldn’t let my kids browse through it), and other annoyances, but suffice to say that it simply didn’t measure up to the expectations I’ve developed from using Apple devices.

Apple is the only computer company that creates all of its own hardware and software; they control the entire package. Personal computers are a mishmash of parts and pieces from different sources. Hardware from one company, software from another. By contrast, many modern smartphone and computer makers get hardware from one place, and an operating system from another. BlackBerry-maker Research in Motion is a notable exception to this rule, but a recent interview with their co-CEO Mike Lazaridis seems to suggest the company’s leadership at least has little sense of what smartphone consumers really want.

HP, which recently purchased Palm, is another exception to the rule. The stage is set for the computing giant to build its own tightly integrated smartphone environment, if they have any interest in doing so. HP now sells the Palm Pre, but unfortunately, the Pre, once seen to be a strong iPhone competitor, seems to be lagging behind. Not a single one of these companies can design and test integration between phones, tablets, computers, and online services as well as Apple can, because none controls each of these aspects the way Apple does.

Does Apple’s degree of control occasionally border on the excessive? Yes. But consumers end up benefitting from that control more often than they are harmed. It’s only because Apple controls the entire product line that you can rent Inception in iTunes on your Mac, and know that it will play on your iPad, your iPhone, and your Apple TV. It works reliably, consistently and predictably.

When you live in the Apple ecosystem, you make a deal with Apple: I’ll pay you, and in exchange, you make sure everything plays nicely together. Google doesn’t seem to be interested in providing that kind of tightly integrated experience, at least not yet.  What Apple does best is remember that technology only exists to serve its users, and goes far beyond a list of features and hardware specs. And that’s why Apple will continue to drive the future of computing, regardless of whether Google and others end up winning the numbers game.

Nexus One too ambitious says Google’s Andy Rubin


Even the head of Google described their launching of the Nexus One was that the company “bit off a little more than we could chew.”  Google never launched the phone in stores, but only allowed buyers to purchase on the Web.  Rubin discussed some of the reasons on what the sales issues with the Nexus One:  scale.  For every operator the phone worked with, they had to set up phone numbers and perform credit checks.  There are over 150 carriers worldwide, so it ended up being a much larger process than anticipated.

The Nexus One wasn’t a complete failure, however.  There was a lot of hype and since it was Google’s first phone for their Android OS, it brought more light to the OS.  It also brings Google’s next phone venture, the Nexus S, which will be released in the next few weeks with much anticipation.

Source:  Yahoo

Commodore Amiga Emulator for iOS Demoed, Coming to App Store


posted by arn on Thursday December 09, 2010 09:48 AM on MacRumours


TouchArcade reveals a first hands-on with an upcoming Commodore Amiga emulator from mobile developer Manomio. Manomio is the developer behind the Commodore 64 emulator for iOS that made headlines after it was originally rejected from the App Store. Manomio’s Commodore 64 emulator eventually returned to the App Store after some favorable changes in App Store policy.

As with its Commodore 64 emulator, Manomio is legally licensing the required intellectual property and is working with individual developers to bring popular Amiga titles to the App Store. Even at this early stage, the emulator is running very well, though input controls need to be polished. The following demo video shows a collection of 10 classic Amiga games including Defender of the Crown, Battle Squadron, International Karate +, R-Type, R-Type II, Speedball, Stunt Car Racer, Shadow of the Beast, Virus, and Xenon 2: Megablast:

The shown games don’t necessarily reflect the selection that will become available in the App Store, as that will depend on the ultimate licensing agreements. The emulator achieves its performance using tuned ARM assembly language and will only support iPhone 3GS / 3rd gen. iPod touch devices and up. No release date has been announced.

Steve Jobs Says MobileMe Will Get a Lot Better – Boy Does It Need To


by PatrickJ on December 10th, 2010 on iSource

MobileMe

In this weeks latest example of ‘Steve does customer service’ Mr. Jobs has apparently told an email correspondent that Apple’s MobileMe service will get a lot better next year. Here’s the exchange reported by a MacRumors reader:

Q: I love my iPad and iPhone4 and am a huge fan of yours and all that Apple does. I desperately want to stay inside of Apple’e ecosystem as much as possible.
However, MobileMe is making it very difficult for me to do so. Unreliable/unpredictable syncing, creating duplicate entries (sometimes scores of them), etc. It’s almost unusable.
And I know from forums (including Apple’s own support boards) that I am not the only one experiencing these very real and frustrating problems.
Please tell me it will get better, and soon?
A: Yes, it will get a lot better in 2011.

That’s a start I guess. I hope he means it because MobileMe right now is one of Apple’s big failures. It seems very unfocused, and just not especially good at any of the things it does.

 

Just as one quick example, iDisk is vastly inferior to other online services like Dropbox. The only I’ve kept on my subscription up to now is for the ‘Find My iPhone’ (and iPad) feature – and now that Apple has recently made that free for non-subscribers, I won’t even consider renewing unless Apple improves MobileMe a whole lot. In fact, I’m not even sure that improvement is what it needs – more like a total revamp is needed I think.

What do you all think? For those who have a MobileMe account, do you get a lot of use / value out of it? Which parts of it are most useful for you?

News Via: MacRumors

Over 300,000 Android Phones Are Being Activated Each Day


By Kat Hannaford on December 9, 2010 at 9:40 PM on Gizmodo

This is a jump-up from the 200,000 sold each day which Eric Schmidt confirmed in August. Andy Rubin, Android’s creator, took to Twitter to make his proud boast – only the second time he’s ever tweeted. [@Arubin via @morrildl]

Woz Bought An iPhone 4 From That Ballsy Chinese Teen


By Casey Chan on December 10, 2010 at 10:40 AM on Gizmodo

Our favourite Steve Wozniak, Apple co-founder, has a white iPhone 4. Surprisingly, he didn’t use his Apple connections to get one though. CNN says Woz got it from that ballsy Chinese teen who sold white iPhones.

In an interview at the Computer History Museum in Silicon Valley, Woz flashed the white iPhone 4, stunning the reporter who was interviewing him. They assumed he used his longstanding relationship with Apple to land one (they’ve been seen on Apple’s campus before). But that’s not our Woz!

His white iPhone 4 is actually a modified black version using authentic parts sold by that teen. According to CNN:

CNN touched base with him after Apple-news blog 9to5 Mac reported that a reader e-mailed Wozniak about this post, and that Woz suggested the phone might be modified with a kit a Chinese teenager was selling before being shut down by Apple.

Wozniak said something similar Wednesday to CNN. “I saw a post and got in quick and ordered my set of parts,” he wrote.

Hopefully, you were as keen as Woz if you wanted the white iPhone 4 too.[9to5Mac via CNN]

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.